What’s
Ailing America?
NON-EXISTENT INFORMED
CONSENT
Rebecca
Carley, MD
www.reversingvaccineinduceddiseases.com
On
Sunday, May 19, 2013 the title of my internet radio show was “What’s
Ailing America? INFORMED CONSENT IS NON-EXISTENT REGARDING
VACCINES”. My guest was Maine State representative Andrea
Boland, who had introduced Bill LD754, titled “An Act to
Encourage Transparency in the Disclosing of the Ingredients in
Vaccinations for Children”. If passed. this is the first time
in the history of vaccinations in the US that parents will be given
a full list of ingredients before their child is vaccinated. Of
course, the medicals doctors who “serve” in the Maine
state legislature are totally against this legislation; certainly
knowing that if parents knew the ingredients of the bioweapon
vaccines being injected into children, they would never allow the
assault to occur in the first place. Thus, their children would not
develop autoimmune disease, non-traumatic seizures, cancer and
genetic damage. Thus, big pharma would implode.
The
article in VacTruth.com by Christina England which discusses Rep.
Boland’s bill can be found at:
Sanford
lawmaker wants doctors to disclose vaccine ingredients
http://vactruth.com/2013/05/09/vaccine-ingredient-disclosure
(Note
that I hear on a regular basis from those who receive my newsletters
that the links I provide are often disabled. This is likely no
“coincidence”, and when it happens I suggest that you put
the heading for the link into a search engine and you should be able
to find another source for the information. It is very important
that everyone check things out for themselves, as we have all been
lied to about everything)
Before
that interview, I was discussing possible strategies as to how to
energize the “Ban Vaccines 2013” movement being conducted
with the founder of that movement, Sallie Elokordy. (She was
interviewed on my RBN show on 4/28/13; and she interviewed me on her
show regarding the true cause of autism and all the disinfo out there
on 5/19/13; link available at
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/themaryandsallieshow/2013/05/19/what-causes-autism-not-mercury-dr-rebecca-carley
). Sallie told me that she and another individual had been talking
about the strategy of bringing up the violations of the principle of
“informed consent” in regards to the inoculation of
children with disease. This sent me on a mission to find the
definition of “informed consent”.
The best site I found can be located at:
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/informed+consent
This
site has definitions from many sources and for many professions.
Some of the highlights are:
From
Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition. © 2009, Elsevier:
…“ The
document used must be written in a language understood by the patient
and be dated and signed by the patient and at least one witness.
Signed
consent should be obtained by the person performing the procedure.
… Informed consent is voluntary. By law, informed consent must
be obtained more than a given number of days or hours before certain
procedures, including therapeutic abortion and sterilization, and
must always be obtained when the patient is fully
competent.
An
individual must be of a certain legal age to give consent;
laws vary from state to state”.
My
comments;
when I was a surgical resident, it was standard operating procedure
to have a 1st
or 2nd
year surgical resident obtain the “informed consent” for
a procedure they oftentimes knew little about. Patients were often
times asked to sign documents after they received preoperative
sedation; by definition, they are not then fully competent. The fact
that an individual must be of a certain legal age to give consent;
this is being blatantly ignored in states trying to legislate that
children can consent to vaccines in school without the knowledge or
consent of the parents.
From
Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and
Allied Health, Seventh Edition. © 2003 by Saunders:
…”
Consent must also be free of
coercion or fraud…Seven criteria define informed consent:
(1) competence to understand and to decide, (2) voluntary decision
making, (3) disclosure of material information, (4) recommendation of
a plan, (5) comprehension of terms (3) and (4), (6) decision in favor
of a plan, and (7) authorization of the plan. A person gives informed
consent only if all of these criteria are met. If all of the criteria
are met except that the person rejects the plan, that person makes an
informed refusal… The physician must explain to the patient
the diagnosis, the nature of the procedure, including the risks
involved and the chances of success, and
the alternative methods of treatment that are available…In
medical research, the
patient must be informed that the procedure is experimental and that
consent can be withdrawn at any time. In addition, the person signing
the consent form must be
informed of the risks and benefits of the experimental procedure and
of alternative treatments.
My
comments:
The
state mandates for vaccination are illegal coercion. Fraud is
occurring in regards to the true side effects of vaccinations, as
demonstrated by the secret documents found by Investigative reporter
Christina England regarding SSPE being autism
(http://vactruth.com/2012/08/30/government-document-vaccine-unsafe
), as well as the secret documents found by researcher Lucija
Tomijenovic, PhD that prove that “the JCVI (Joint Committee on
Vaccination and Immunization) withhold critical data on severe
adverse reactions and contraindications to both parents and health
practitioners…by doing so both the international guidelines
for medical ethics and also their own code of practice have been
violated”
(http://www.endalldisease.com/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-secret-documents-reveal-shocking-truth
). Informed consent must also inform the patient of “alternative”
methods of treatment available; of course, since medical doctors are
taught only what big parma wants them to do to manage dis-ease, they
are incompetent in this regard. In regards to patients in clinical
trials being warned of risks of experimental procedures and
treatmants, this is an insane concept…since the whole point of
a clinical trial is to see what happens to an experimental subject.
In fact, clinical trials are being done more and more in third world
countries , where the children are used like lab rats. When they
suffer severe adverse reactions denial and cover-up commence
(http://vactruth.com/2013/05/19/menafrivac-nuremberg-gouro
).
From
Mosby's Dental Dictionary, 2nd edition. © 2008 Elsevier, Inc.:
…informed
consent is an agreement…after
being told in sufficient detail of possible risks….
My
comment: WHO decides what “sufficient detail” is?
Please
access these definitions of informed consent, and start demanding
that any white coat you deal with give you true informed consent
before any
treatment…
If
you need help in reversing your disease with natural therapies.
please go to http://www.reversingvaccineinduceddiseases.com/services
to learn how Dr. Carley does consults. (Note that Alzheimers can be
reversed as long as there is family available to give the person
their remedies). Also, listen to “What’s Ailing America?
on www.republicbroadcasting.org
on Sun from 4-6 PM EST. You can also access many archives of shows
Dr. Carley has done over the last few years at
http://thelightofdayradioshow.com/archives/RBN-BACKUP/commercialFree.html
.